Re: Future plans after 1.3?
Adam Gibson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/13/2009 06:34 PM, Quark Group - Hilton Travis wrote: > So, what happens when some malware gets installed on a PC Malware could use UPNP but I don't see why they would. It would be too unreliable because of other external filtering, local client firewall software that might not allow the UPNP by default, gateways that have UPNP disabled, etc. They currently just use the outgoing tunnelling method. It is much more reliable to establish an outgoing channel from the infected PC to a remote server which is compromised and use that as a tunnel to allow them to connect back in to the desktop. Not to say disabling UPNP is not advisable. I do the same thing on every gateway system I have control over including family members gateways. Mainly to restrict legitimate software that gets installed though.