Re: WAN blocked and should not be
"Andrew Tillman" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ah, thank you!! I didn't see any of that in the literature :( The hardware firewall handles NAT and DMZ, so I think I will try to just give the monowall WAN a different IP scheme and see if that works. If that doesn't work I will give the hardware firewall a different IP scheme and go from there. Thank you for the help, again!! -- Andrew Tillman Tech Specialist Lee County Library Leesburg, GA 31763 [email protected] > Andrew Tillman wrote: >> NAT is turned off. >> >> Both IPs are on the same subnet because of the existing internal >> network. If I just unhook the WAN will captive portal still work if >> monowall is plugged into the switch? > > That is the point. The CP works through the routed interface. You need > routing. So you need a second subnet, and a static route on your > hardware firewall to the internal subnet with a next hop of the WAN > interface. > > Lee > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >