Re: Re: m0n0wall 1.3 released
Chris Buechler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Manuel Kasper <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22.02.2010, at 12:15, N.J. Mann wrote: > >> "... Unfortunately, although the EDNS standard has been around for a >> long time there are still many "middleboxes" (firewalls, broadband >> routers, etc.) that have problems with these larger responses." >> >> So, will Dnsmasq need update as well? > > Not as far as I know dnsmasq is fine with EDNS. From the man page: -P, --edns-packet-max=<size> Specify the largest EDNS.0 UDP packet which is supported by the DNS forwarder. Defaults to 4096, which is the RFC5625-recommended size. m0n0wall uses the default.