RE: 1.32 and IPv6

Thaks all for replying. I have the tunnel variant running for more than 6
months without any problems. It is just now that I face the migration to
native IPv6 and don't want to much disturbance in my network. I think I'll
buy a modem later today and fire up a separate monowall box to experiment a
bit. One problem I foresee is the ISP connection; that will have problems
with a changing DUID when I replace the existing FritzBox modem with other
hardware.

Tnx
Egbert Jan 

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Ian Pickworth [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Verzonden: dinsdag 20 april 2010 13:58
> Aan: Thompson, Andrew
> CC: Egbert Jan; 'mono'
> Onderwerp: RE: [m0n0wall] 1.32 and IPv6
> 
> 
> I can second that, with a slightly different configuration. 
> In my case I have set Monowall to use IPv6 tunnel mode, 
> specified the AAISP IPv4 tunnel end point on Monowall, and my 
> allocated IPv4 address specified from the AAISP end. I have 
> to run a tunnel since ADSL/Modem combination don;t seem to be 
> IPv6 capable.
> 
> I did find that configuring a /64 subnet on the LAN interface 
> allowed the router advertising feature to work. Using a /48 
> subnet on the LAN interface provoked Monowall to complain 
> that it could not advertise the prefix because it was too 
> long (might not have details right - I was in a hurry). 
> Configring /48 facing AAISP and /64 facing in to my LAN works fine.
> 
> Regards
> 
> > Whilst I can't answer your specific questions, I can tell 
> you that I 
> > am running m0n0wall 1.32 with native IPv6 from Andrews & 
> Arnold in the 
> > UK and everything works as expected.
> >
> > More info on their implementation is available here:
> >
> > http://www.aaisp.net.uk/kb-broadband-ipv6.html
> >
> > In m0n0wall we set the IPv6 WAN option to PPP, configure our 
> > allocation under the LAN settings, tweak the firewall rules, and it 
> > "just works".
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Egbert Jan [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 20 April 2010 11:32
> > To: 'mono'
> > Subject: [m0n0wall] 1.32 and IPv6
> >
> > Hi, I have a question with regard to IPv6. I'm taking part 
> in a pilot 
> > for native IPv6 (unnumbered, /48 Prefix delegation) orgaized by 
> > XS4ALL, a Dutch ISP that goes a bit further than most others...
> >
> > The question is: does monowall honor all DHCPv6 
> advertisements/requsts 
> > as client on the WAN port? In this pilot we get a /48 delegated and 
> > the v6 address of a DNS server. Maybe more. I do not know 
> all ins and 
> > outs of the xs4all setup. Someone om the ipv6 mailing list 
> mentioned 
> > that monowall does not listen to the advertisements on the WAN and 
> > consequently dos not picks up the /48 prefix.
> >
> > 1.32 has several IPv6 enhancements but the release info is a bit 
> > short, hence my question.
> >
> > TIA
> > Egbert Jan (NL)
> >
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> 
> 
>