RE: 1.32 and IPv6

"Egbert Jan" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall
Message-ID <E34891670F174C88B519E8884B0418B7@asus>
Guys, can you reach your external modem thru monowall? When I set the WAN
port to pppoe, it has no real address anymore... I found out that doing
pppoe from my laptop works fine to establish a connection to my ISP (no
monowall in between, Vigor 120 in pppoe to ppp0a passthru mode) AND that I
can still reach the web interface of the modem. Obviously this goes outside
the ppp tunnel. Would be nice to have that too when I place the monowall box
in between...

Egbert Jan

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Ian Pickworth [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Verzonden: dinsdag 20 april 2010 13:58
> Aan: Thompson, Andrew
> CC: Egbert Jan; 'mono'
> Onderwerp: RE: [m0n0wall] 1.32 and IPv6
> 
> 
> I can second that, with a slightly different configuration. 
> In my case I have set Monowall to use IPv6 tunnel mode, 
> specified the AAISP IPv4 tunnel end point on Monowall, and my 
> allocated IPv4 address specified from the AAISP end. I have 
> to run a tunnel since ADSL/Modem combination don;t seem to be 
> IPv6 capable.
> 
> I did find that configuring a /64 subnet on the LAN interface 
> allowed the router advertising feature to work. Using a /48 
> subnet on the LAN interface provoked Monowall to complain 
> that it could not advertise the prefix because it was too 
> long (might not have details right - I was in a hurry). 
> Configring /48 facing AAISP and /64 facing in to my LAN works fine.
> 
> Regards
> 
> > Whilst I can't answer your specific questions, I can tell 
> you that I 
> > am running m0n0wall 1.32 with native IPv6 from Andrews & 
> Arnold in the 
> > UK and everything works as expected.
> >
> > More info on their implementation is available here:
> >
> > http://www.aaisp.net.uk/kb-broadband-ipv6.html
> >
> > In m0n0wall we set the IPv6 WAN option to PPP, configure our 
> > allocation under the LAN settings, tweak the firewall rules, and it 
> > "just works".
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Egbert Jan [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 20 April 2010 11:32
> > To: 'mono'
> > Subject: [m0n0wall] 1.32 and IPv6
> >
> > Hi, I have a question with regard to IPv6. I'm taking part 
> in a pilot 
> > for native IPv6 (unnumbered, /48 Prefix delegation) orgaized by 
> > XS4ALL, a Dutch ISP that goes a bit further than most others...
> >
> > The question is: does monowall honor all DHCPv6 
> advertisements/requsts 
> > as client on the WAN port? In this pilot we get a /48 delegated and 
> > the v6 address of a DNS server. Maybe more. I do not know 
> all ins and 
> > outs of the xs4all setup. Someone om the ipv6 mailing list 
> mentioned 
> > that monowall does not listen to the advertisements on the WAN and 
> > consequently dos not picks up the /48 prefix.
> >
> > 1.32 has several IPv6 enhancements but the release info is a bit 
> > short, hence my question.
> >
> > TIA
> > Egbert Jan (NL)
> >
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> 
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.