Re: [PATCH nf v2] netfilter: nf_reject: initialize IPCB at inet ingress

On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 04:07:03PM +0000, David Lee wrote:
> From: Kyle Zeng <[email protected]>
> 
> The inet ingress hook runs before ip_rcv_core() and ip6_rcv_core(), so
> neither IPCB nor IP6CB has been initialized when nft_reject_inet passes
> a packet to nf_send_unreach() or nf_send_unreach6(). skb->cb can
> therefore retain metadata from an earlier protocol layer.
> 
> For IPv4, icmp_send() treats IPCB(skb)->opt as parsed IPv4 options.
> Stale option offsets can make __ip_options_echo() copy an
> attacker-controlled length into its 40-byte reply option buffer and
> overflow the stack. On an unpatched v7.2-rc5 kernel, the IPv4
> reproducer produced:
> 
>   BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __ip_options_echo()
>   Write of size 255
> 
> For IPv6, icmpv6_send() consumes IP6CB(skb) as parsed IPv6 metadata. It
> always uses iif for source selection and, when MIP6 is enabled, uses
> dsthao as an extension-header offset. These fields must not be stale.
> 
> For NF_INET_INGRESS, clear the address-family-specific control block
> and restore its input interface before constructing the ICMP error.
> This matches the initialization normally performed by ip_rcv_core()
> and ip6_rcv_core().
> 
> Fixes: 117ca1f8920c ("netfilter: nft_reject_inet: allow to use reject from inet ingress")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6-sol Codex:gpt-5.5-cyber
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Zeng <[email protected]>
> Co-developed-by: David Lee <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: David Lee <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Initialize IP6CB in nf_send_unreach6() for inet ingress.
> - Preserve the IPv6 input interface before constructing the reply dst.
> 
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netfilter-devel/[email protected]/
> 
> Bug found and triaged by OpenAI Security Research and
> validated by Trail of Bits.
> 
> Trail of Bits has an IPv4 reproducer for this bug that triggers the
> KASAN stack-out-of-bounds write in __ip_options_echo() and can share it
> if needed. A separate IPv6 test reaches nf_send_unreach6() from inet
> ingress and confirms that an ICMPv6 unreachable is constructed.
> 
>  net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c | 6 ++++++
>  net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c | 9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c
> index 4626dc46808f..4933f65138d6 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c
> @@ -355,6 +355,12 @@ void nf_send_unreach(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int code, int hook)
>  	if (!skb_dst(skb_in) && nf_reject_fill_skb_dst(skb_in) < 0)
>  		return;
>  
> +	/* Inet ingress runs before IPv4 initializes IPCB. */
> +	if (hook == NF_INET_INGRESS) {
> +		memset(IPCB(skb_in), 0, sizeof(*IPCB(skb_in)));
> +		IPCB(skb_in)->iif = skb_in->skb_iif;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (skb_csum_unnecessary(skb_in) ||
>  	    !nf_reject_verify_csum(skb_in, dataoff, proto)) {
>  		icmp_send(skb_in, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, code, 0);
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c
> index ef5b7e85cffa..c36910b8a95a 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #include <net/ip6_fib.h>
>  #include <net/ip6_checksum.h>
>  #include <net/netfilter/ipv6/nf_reject.h>
> +#include <net/dst_metadata.h>
>  #include <linux/netfilter_ipv6.h>
>  #include <linux/netfilter_bridge.h>
>  
> @@ -440,6 +441,14 @@ void nf_send_unreach6(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb_in,
>  	if (hooknum == NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT && skb_in->dev == NULL)
>  		skb_in->dev = net->loopback_dev;
>  
> +	/* Inet ingress runs before IPv6 initializes IP6CB. */
> +	if (hooknum == NF_INET_INGRESS) {
> +		memset(IP6CB(skb_in), 0, sizeof(*IP6CB(skb_in)));
> +		IP6CB(skb_in)->iif = skb_valid_dst(skb_in) ?
> +				     ip6_dst_idev(skb_dst(skb_in))->dev->ifindex :
> +				     skb_in->dev->ifindex;

Why do different? Maybe just use:

        IP6CB(skb_in)->iif = skb_in->skb_iif;

like in the IPv4 chunk?

> +	}
> +
>  	if (!skb_dst(skb_in) && nf_reject6_fill_skb_dst(skb_in) < 0)
>  		return;
>  
> -- 
> 2.53.0
>