Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: x_tables: reject missing '-p' flag and check for INV flag

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 03:41:36PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> ip6tables traverser doesn't walk ipv6 extension headers unless the PROTO
> flag is set, so direct sockopt-users can bypass the check (ip6tables
> always sets it if '-p' flag is given.  This is a cleanup patch, it
> doesn't fix any real bug.

I really think it is better to squash the TPROXY fix into this one
too, it is the same logical fix.

Sashiko also hinting to fix ip6_tables core check for this protocol
flag:

https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260821134136.18191-1-fw%40strlen.de

Thanks!

> Reported-by: Zhiling Zou <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 74f77a6b2b1c ("netfilter: introduce l2tp match extension")
> Fixes: af0d29cd2a73 ("netfilter: xtables: add an IPv6 capable version of the ECN match")
> Fixes: a89ecb6a2ef7 ("[NETFILTER]: x_tables: unify IPv4/IPv6 multiport match")
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
> ---
>  Can also be applied to nf, but I don't think this one is urgent.
> 
>  net/netfilter/xt_ecn.c       |  3 ++-
>  net/netfilter/xt_l2tp.c      | 11 +++++++----
>  net/netfilter/xt_multiport.c |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_ecn.c b/net/netfilter/xt_ecn.c
> index a8503f5d26bf..008e7fcbeb22 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/xt_ecn.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_ecn.c
> @@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ static int ecn_mt_check6(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (info->operation & (XT_ECN_OP_MATCH_ECE | XT_ECN_OP_MATCH_CWR) &&
> -	    (ip->proto != IPPROTO_TCP || ip->invflags & IP6T_INV_PROTO)) {
> +	    (!(ip->flags & IP6T_F_PROTO) ||
> +	     ip->proto != IPPROTO_TCP || ip->invflags & IP6T_INV_PROTO)) {
>  		pr_info_ratelimited("cannot match TCP bits for non-tcp packets\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_l2tp.c b/net/netfilter/xt_l2tp.c
> index a61eb81e9f49..ad2d559caa99 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/xt_l2tp.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_l2tp.c
> @@ -267,8 +267,9 @@ static int l2tp_mt_check4(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
>  	if (ret != 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	if ((ip->proto != IPPROTO_UDP) &&
> -	    (ip->proto != IPPROTO_L2TP)) {
> +	if (ip->invflags & IPT_INV_PROTO ||
> +	    (ip->proto != IPPROTO_UDP &&
> +	    ip->proto != IPPROTO_L2TP)) {
>  		pr_info_ratelimited("missing protocol rule (udp|l2tpip)\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> @@ -294,8 +295,10 @@ static int l2tp_mt_check6(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
>  	if (ret != 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	if ((ip->proto != IPPROTO_UDP) &&
> -	    (ip->proto != IPPROTO_L2TP)) {
> +	if (((ip->flags & IP6T_F_PROTO) == 0 ||
> +	     ip->invflags & IP6T_INV_PROTO ||
> +	   (ip->proto != IPPROTO_UDP &&
> +	    ip->proto != IPPROTO_L2TP))) {
>  		pr_info_ratelimited("missing protocol rule (udp|l2tpip)\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_multiport.c b/net/netfilter/xt_multiport.c
> index a1691ff405d3..48aa25749063 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/xt_multiport.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_multiport.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,9 @@ static int multiport_mt6_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
>  	const struct ip6t_ip6 *ip = par->entryinfo;
>  	const struct xt_multiport_v1 *multiinfo = par->matchinfo;
>  
> +	if (!(ip->flags & IP6T_F_PROTO))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	if (!check(ip->proto, ip->invflags, multiinfo->flags, multiinfo->count))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -- 
> 2.54.0
> 
>