Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0
Brian Blater <[email protected]> Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:04:08 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.wizards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Christopher J. Wargaski <[email protected]> wrote: > Brian-- > One of the things that the unrestricted license for a 515E does is allow > more than 3 network interfaces. When you run the "sh ver" do you indeed see > the UR license listed? Also, when you run "sh int" with the 4FE card > installed, do you see all the interfaces? I do not think that the license > needs to be upgraded or reapplied when upgrading to a new major PIX-OS > release. However, I do not think that I have tried it. Here is a thought, > save your config, wipe NVRAM and load 6.3(5) on to see if all 6 interfaces > work. > If you are unable to make the 4FE card work, you can always put the 1FE > card i, trunk to a managed switch and use VLAN interfaces. > Now that DHCP and routing have been addressed, is inbound and outbound > traffic flowing on the inside and outside interfaces? > > > cjw Now that I've figured out which port is which on the 4FE-66 (see my previous post) basically everything is working as expected. One new question about this is if my inside interface is a security 100 and my dmz is a security 50 and I have no ACL defined on the inside interface, how come a ping from the inside to the a device on the dmz does not work? The only ACLs on the inside are the implicit rules any to any less secure and any any deny. Is it that I would need to have an additional rule on the dmz to allow icmp from the inside to the dmz? Thank you for the help. If you can't tell, I know enough to be dangerous, but certainly not enough to be a guru at this. Brian