Re: Honeyclients info

Kathy Wang <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:37:58 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.honeypots
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all,

To follow up on a previously posted thread...

Just wanted to let you know that I did present on honeyclients at
RECON (http://www.recon.cx) this past Saturday. Overall, the audience
response was very positive - and everyone seemed to have something
to say about honeyclients.

There is now a project page for honeyclient development. It is located
at http://www.honeyclient.org

At that site, you can download the latest honeyclient tarball, and 
join the mailing list for honeyclients. The talk slides are also available
for download.

I look forward to talking with you.

Kathy

On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 09:57:18PM -0400, Kathy Wang <[email protected]> stated:
>Hi David,
>
>On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 07:20:35PM -0500, David Jiménez Domínguez <[email protected]> stated:
>>Hi Kathy!!
>>
>>As I can see, is like looking for attacks  from HTTP, FTP, DNS
>>servers..... (If I'm not wrong)
>
>Yes, you're correct here.
>
>>
>>but, does the idea is to do the scan by itself (like a spider) or
>>while I'm using my web browser?
>
>While you could do it either way, I'm implementing mine as a spider.
> 
>>Is it going to report the events to a centralized sever... (may be a
>>honeyserver)?
>
>Right now, there is no centralized server, but it could certainly
>be done that way.
>
>>
>>It looks like a interesting idea... just like dinamic honeypots....
>
>Thanks, and I'm looking forward to seeing what you think when it
>is released.
>
>Kathy
>
>>
>>
>>
>>2005/4/20, Kathy Wang <[email protected]>:
>>> Hi David,
>>> 
>>> Saw your message, and thought I should respond...
>>> 
>>> I first came up with the concept of honeyclients back in November
>>> of last year, as a way to detect new attacks. As great as the honeypot
>>> technology is, I consider it to be a passive device. This means it
>>> sits on the network, and waits. Many users nowadays are experiencing
>>> attacks from malicious servers, and existing honeypots cannot detect
>>> these types of attacks.
>>> 
>>> Honeyclients are the opposite of honeypots. The purpose of a honeyclient
>>> is to go out and hit servers, thus looking for bad stuff. These servers
>>> can serve HTTP or other services such as DNS, FTP, P2P, etc.
>>> 
>>> I wrote a whitepaper last year about the types of attacks that can be
>>> detected using honeyclients, and plan on releasing a honeyclient tool
>>> at RECON. Unfortunately, I cannot release the whitepaper at this time.
>>> The honeyclient will be a BSD-licensed HTTP honeyclient, so you'll be
>>> able to try it out for yourself, shortly.
>>> 
>>> Kathy
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:09:39PM -0500, David Jiménez Domínguez <[email protected]> stated:
>>> >Hi folks!!!
>>> >
>>> >Do you know what a honeyclient is??
>>> >
>>> >What is the difference between a high-interaction honeypot and a honeyclient?
>>> >
>>> >Do yo have docs about it?
>>> >
>>> >In Recon 2005 there is a speaker (Kathy Wang) who is going to speak
>>> >about it, but I'm not going to be there.... I have seen that some
>>> >honetnet projects are moving to this kind of technology.... but what
>>> >is it?
>>> >
>>> >------------------
>>> >David.
>>>