Re: Honeyclients info
Kathy Wang <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:37:58 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.honeypots |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, To follow up on a previously posted thread... Just wanted to let you know that I did present on honeyclients at RECON (http://www.recon.cx) this past Saturday. Overall, the audience response was very positive - and everyone seemed to have something to say about honeyclients. There is now a project page for honeyclient development. It is located at http://www.honeyclient.org At that site, you can download the latest honeyclient tarball, and join the mailing list for honeyclients. The talk slides are also available for download. I look forward to talking with you. Kathy On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 09:57:18PM -0400, Kathy Wang <[email protected]> stated: >Hi David, > >On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 07:20:35PM -0500, David Jiménez Domínguez <[email protected]> stated: >>Hi Kathy!! >> >>As I can see, is like looking for attacks from HTTP, FTP, DNS >>servers..... (If I'm not wrong) > >Yes, you're correct here. > >> >>but, does the idea is to do the scan by itself (like a spider) or >>while I'm using my web browser? > >While you could do it either way, I'm implementing mine as a spider. > >>Is it going to report the events to a centralized sever... (may be a >>honeyserver)? > >Right now, there is no centralized server, but it could certainly >be done that way. > >> >>It looks like a interesting idea... just like dinamic honeypots.... > >Thanks, and I'm looking forward to seeing what you think when it >is released. > >Kathy > >> >> >> >>2005/4/20, Kathy Wang <[email protected]>: >>> Hi David, >>> >>> Saw your message, and thought I should respond... >>> >>> I first came up with the concept of honeyclients back in November >>> of last year, as a way to detect new attacks. As great as the honeypot >>> technology is, I consider it to be a passive device. This means it >>> sits on the network, and waits. Many users nowadays are experiencing >>> attacks from malicious servers, and existing honeypots cannot detect >>> these types of attacks. >>> >>> Honeyclients are the opposite of honeypots. The purpose of a honeyclient >>> is to go out and hit servers, thus looking for bad stuff. These servers >>> can serve HTTP or other services such as DNS, FTP, P2P, etc. >>> >>> I wrote a whitepaper last year about the types of attacks that can be >>> detected using honeyclients, and plan on releasing a honeyclient tool >>> at RECON. Unfortunately, I cannot release the whitepaper at this time. >>> The honeyclient will be a BSD-licensed HTTP honeyclient, so you'll be >>> able to try it out for yourself, shortly. >>> >>> Kathy >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:09:39PM -0500, David Jiménez Domínguez <[email protected]> stated: >>> >Hi folks!!! >>> > >>> >Do you know what a honeyclient is?? >>> > >>> >What is the difference between a high-interaction honeypot and a honeyclient? >>> > >>> >Do yo have docs about it? >>> > >>> >In Recon 2005 there is a speaker (Kathy Wang) who is going to speak >>> >about it, but I'm not going to be there.... I have seen that some >>> >honetnet projects are moving to this kind of technology.... but what >>> >is it? >>> > >>> >------------------ >>> >David. >>>