Re: [Prelude Hybrid IDS] #216: mod_security cleanup, and compatibility with version 2.0
"Prelude Hybrid IDS" <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:53:46 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ids.prelude.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
#216: mod_security cleanup, and compatibility with version 2.0 -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: gegomez | Owner: Peter Vrabec <[email protected]> Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: normal | Milestone: Prelude-LML 0.9.13 Component: prelude-lml | Version: 0.9 Severity: normal | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Comment(by [email protected]): Replying to [comment:12 yoann]: > Replying to [comment:11 [email protected]]: > > Replying to [comment:10 yoann]: > > > Replying to [comment:7 [email protected]]: > > > This is used for regression testing and reviewing generated alerts: > > > {{{ > > > cd prelude-lml/tests > > > ./loggrep.py ../plugins/pcre/ruleset/<name of your ruleset>.rules | ../src/prelude-lml --dry-run --metadata=nowrite,head --batch-mode --no- resolve --pcre --dump-unmatched --config ./prelude-lml.conf --text-output > > > }}} Hi, I get this warning if I run your test: "WARNING: No alert emited for log entry" (for all LOG: entries). But I'm sure that this ruleset generates alerts, because I tested it in "normal" mode and it worked for each LOG: entry. So, what can be wrong? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.prelude-ids.org/ticket/216#comment:13> Prelude Hybrid IDS <http://www.prelude-ids.org> The Prelude Hybrid Intrusion Detection System suite _______________________________________________ Prelude-devel site list [email protected] http://lists.prelude-ids.org/mailman/listinfo/prelude-devel