Re: SSH bruteforce on its way...
Michael Lang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.incidents |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 08:29 +0200, Lionel Ferette wrote: > Hello Michael, > Hello Lionel, > In the wise words of [email protected], on Tuesday 25 October 2005 > 09:29: > [SNIP] > > I've put the session data on a website > > (http://www.jackal-net.at/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=20) where you can > > see what i've setup and what the guys where doing. (currently only one > > session is online but i'm sure, others will follow :) ... ) > Just had a look at that page, and I would recommend against using ethereal to > capture traffic: there are too many vulnerabilities in ethereal's decoders (a > few have been disclosed last week) to allow that program to run unattended as > root (needed to capture traffic). Instead, I always recommend to use tcpdump: > tcpdump -s 1500 -w traffic.trace port 22 > (in your case you're only interested in ssh traffic, aren't you? otherwise, > just skip the 'port 22' part). > > Then, *as a normal user*, open the trace file with ethereal if you don't like > tcpdump's output of > tcpdump -s 1500 -r traffic.trace -X i´m running ethereal on a Host *outside* of the Machine which runs Fedora Core4 Ethereal version ethereal-0.10.13-1.FC4.2 which should be aware of all currently known issues. thanks anyway Kind regards Michael Lang > > Regards, > > Lionel > -- Michael Lang <[email protected]>