RE: New Trojan on the block [CIA Trojan]
"Davis, Myron" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.intrusions |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D0CD1BF9C88ED511B6E100508BBB43BD049149BE@jnu-exchange.dec.state.ak.us> |
I don't know where you generated the list, but please add clamav (the open source virus definitions) to that list. http://www.clamav.net/sendvirus.html There are a lot of people using the windows (http://clamwin.net) and unix ports of this GPL scanner. -Myron -----Original Message----- From: Nick FitzGerald [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 3:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Intrusions] New Trojan on the block [CIA Trojan] <snip> Authentium (Command Antivirus) <[email protected]> Computer Associates (US) <[email protected]> Computer Associates (Vet/EZ) <[email protected]> DialogueScience (Dr. Web) <[email protected]> Eset (NOD32) <[email protected]> F-Secure Corp. <[email protected]> Frisk Software (F-PROT) <[email protected]> Grisoft (AVG) <[email protected]> H+BEDV (AntiVir, Vexira engine) <[email protected]> Kaspersky Labs <[email protected]> Network Associates (McAfee) <[email protected]> (use a ZIP file with the password 'infected' without the quotes) Norman (NVC) <[email protected]> Panda Software <[email protected]> Sophos Plc. <[email protected]> Symantec (Norton) <[email protected]> Trend Micro (PC-cillin) <[email protected]> (Trend may only accept files from users of its products) Most of these addresses are monitored either by 24x365 malware support and analysis teams, or have distributed processing around the globe providing (close to) 24x365 coverage. Several have automated code analysis systems that get the "first look" at submitted files, classifying them for further attention or simply sending back canned reports of the "we detect it in the DEF update that should ship at X or you can download a pre-QA copy at Y". Depending on the nature of the files you submit, you should get several quite prompt responses, at some of which you'll have to ignore (e.g. a downloader detection is pretty meaningless as the target of a downloader is usually considered to be a non-code variable and ignored by any semi-intelligent detection of that downloader, so the same downloader can be used multiple times configured to snag stuff from different URLs and will always be detected as the same downloader and variant). -- Nick FitzGerald Computer Virus Consulting Ltd. Ph/FAX: +64 3 3529854 _______________________________________________ Intrusions mailing list [email protected] http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/intrusions _______________________________________________ Intrusions mailing list [email protected] http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/intrusions