i2p project overview doc for the SDK
Hezekiah <[email protected]> Fri, 8 Aug 2003 00:49:36 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.invisiblenet.iip.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, all! :) On Thursday, August 07, 2003 20:03, auto97841-revL73yDgGBWk0Htik3J/[email protected] wrote: > here's a draft of the doc referred to in the readme i posted the other > day. it may or may not be more controversial than usual, since it has > some philosophy that not everyone on the team may fully agree with (what, > you mean you aren't all militant anarchists too?). I thought the militant anarchist comment was a joke until I read the first page of the pdf. He wasn't joking! ;-) > > so, from what I can see, we're definitely going to have the I2P SDK ready > for 0.1 release next week [since, well, technically, we have it all now > and all thats left is wrapping 'er up] > > So, please, read this and the readme over asap and get your comments > and ideas in so the docs can be adjusted. OK. Here's my comment. I can't even live with the first page. Many of the comments are straight against the grain of my opinions/beliefs. However, if we all sat down and tried to come up with a document we all agree with, it would take longer than developing the software itself. So here's what I propose: Let this be released as jrand0m's personal opinions and description of the project. A little paragraph should be put in place stating that this are his views and do not reflect those of the rest of the developers. (The paragraph could be placed right after the title paragraph and before the Declaration of Intent.) Here's a sample: This document reflects the personal views and opinions of jrand0m. It does not reflect the views of the Invisible Internet Project as a whole or the views of any individual developers of the Invisible Internet Project. Anyway, that's my suggestion. Even though I disagree with the content of the document (mainly the first page), I can live with it being released as long as people realize that it's only jrand0m's view. This method also allows for other developers to write their own view points (which might not be a bad idea). That's my $.02. > > -jrandom -- Hezekiah
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/MyvueHiZTMH32ioRAgwIAJ9hYZE+6ApqcZcSl2Vp/2HrsHNK5wCfZnqI LcCtxmx5BQqLOKRQh9hpkko= =Fw0L -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----