Re: A proposal for a package management system

Tom Eichstaedt <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.ipcop.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am 26.01.2012 19:43, schrieb Michael Rasmussen:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:10:11 +0100
> Tom Eichstaedt<[email protected]>  wrote:
>
>> Am 24.01.2012 08:28, schrieb Gilles Espinasse:
>>
>>> Yes package management is for me a priority on next version (not 2.0.x,
>>> probably 2.1)
>>
>> We should not forget what IPCop is:
>>
>> A firewall.
>>
> And your point is?

There is simply no need for a package management system.
We should keep it simple, straightforward and well-known, as it is now.

Cheers Tom.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.