Re: A proposal for a package management system
David W Studeman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ipcop.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/29/2012 4:47 AM, G.W. Haywood wrote: > Hi there, > > On 24-29 Jan 2012, Gilles Espinasse and Olaf Westrik wrote: > >>>> Yes package management is for me a priority on next version... >>> >>> What for? >> >> Faster update first. >> >> We have fix for 2.0.3 that could have been delivered one month ago. > > Please can someone explain to me in simple terms exactly why the lack > of a built-in package management system is delaying the propagation of > IPCop updates by periods of the order of months? > > -- > > 73, > Ged. > What makes you think so? Is this a complaint about the frequency of updates? Patch Tuesday belongs to Microsoft, not IPCop. What delays are you speaking of? I wasn't aware of any scheduled frequency that updates are supposed to propagate and what you would expect from these updates. -- Dave Studeman http://www.raqcop.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2