Re: Solos PCI
David W Studeman <[email protected]> Fri, 03 Jan 2014 06:28:17 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ipcop.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Olaf wrote: > On 2013-12-27 23:00, David W Studeman wrote: >> I noticed that there is a newer version of the out of kernel solos-pci >> drivers on SF as of last July which is now 1.0.4. The in kernel version >> looks to be still at version 0.07. Of course you need the out of kernel >> tarball to get the utilities anyway. > > No problem, as we do not use the in-kernel version anyway. > Looks like newer kernel versions (3.10+) come with an up-to-date > solos-pci driver. I noticed that as well. >> Olaf, did you ever get to test one of the Geos units from Traverse? To >> anyone else reading, the Traverse Geos platform has the solos-pci built >> into the motherboard and can be had in single or dual adsl config but not >> the quad port like the pci mammoth I have to play with. Traverse has been >> better about updated firmware lately for their cards they spun off to >> Rocksolid. > > Yes, worked properly. > Special version of the ADSL firmware is required to deal with the Annex > version we run here in Germany. If I remember correctly you are in Annex M territory? By the way, I'm one of those people here whose ADSL does not require PPPoE. My connection is simply DHCP and it needs no authentication. I have been running modems in bridge mode and dhcp on red type in setup which in this case simply means that the mac address of the red nick is what they grant the dhcp request to. The issue with any of the pci adsl modems is that while I need some of that info, I can see where both the solos and pulsar need another entry below the static ip for dhcp much like some of the other modems have. As far as authentication, either it can be optional, have a radio button to disable it or just do what I have done with some of the older cellular modems from ten years ago where it did not need the user name nor password so I put fake info in to satisfy the setup. Funny I should mention this now when 2.1.1 is at RC1. My ISP itself is supposed to be supporting bonded adsl but that in itself is rather vague. I need more data. The regions that have bonded are in PPPoE territory whereas the Pacific Northwest has always been DHCP with the last two. GTE to Verizon West to Frontier. At least the new company has been doing massive upgrades. I think it's a tossup between Bonded ADSL or VDSL as some regions have VDSL instead. I have my Solos sitting in one of my Symantec 5420's and updated to the latest firmware several days ago. It's quite easy to do this. Modprobe the driver with extra parameters and it finds the firmware in /lib/firmware. It took quite a while on the quad port but it finished successfully. As soon as I finish my wall jack to have one port for each twisted pair in my computer room I'll be able to test it. -- Dave Studeman http://www.raqcop.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk