Re: ipcop deployment
"G.W. Haywood" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ipcop.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi there, On Thu, 28 May 2015, scout_iosif wrote: > My brother has a slack core at workplace ... > 81.xxx.xxx.64 and 81.xxx.xxx.95 are used by system (slack). No, they are respectively the network address and broadcast address for the /27 network. > External subnet is .240 and internal is .224, also assigned by ISP. I think you mean the netmasks. For example 224+31 = 255, it's a /27, giving (2 to the power (32-27)) = 32 addresses of which 30 are usable because a network address and a broadcast address are not usable. > Can an IPCOP be deployed to replace the old slack? Yes, but some tinkering will prrobably be required. > he also would like to add some filtering to the network > (eg. specific web addresses blocked) You need to be more specific. -- 73, Ged. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ IPCop-user mailing list [email protected] Manage your subscription or unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user