Re: BoF slot applied for...
David Conrad <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:57:47 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.key-distribution |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <B9BDC28B.13274%[email protected]> |
Michael, Given the political polarization and deadlock in the IETF these days, I would think a more efficient means to facilitate interoperability would be to get working code that meets people's real world requirements, work out the bugs, then throw a document that describes the working protocol over to the IETF as an informational RFC. Rgds, -drc On 9/30/02 7:27 AM, "Michael Richardson" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> "Jakob" == Jakob Schlyter <[email protected]> writes: >>> Do we ask for a second BOF slot in Atlanta? > > Jakob> no, I think we should hold until we've have more experience with > actual > Jakob> deployment of the things, like sshfp and ipseckey, people are working > on. > > It is not clear to me how those items can even advance. > > ] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls > [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net > architect[ > ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device > driver[ > ] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); > [ > >