Re: BoF slot applied for...

At 10:37 2002-09-30, Jakob Schlyter wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> >     Jakob> no, I think we should hold until we've have more experience 
> with actual
> >     Jakob> deployment of the things, like sshfp and ipseckey, people 
> are working on.
> >
> >   It is not clear to me how those items can even advance.
>
>I can not see any reason why ssh would be pushed forward as experimental

s/would/would NOT/
s/as/as at least/

>by the secsh wg.

The ipseckey record can go forward as soon as there is consensus on the
format and contents.

Summary:
sshfp is a minimalist record that only provides key footprint.
ipseckey is on the other extreme including other information that IPSEC
         protocol entities can use.

Both types of <keying> records have a place and we should play with both.

         Olafur