Re: can Hopster traffic be blocked?

Prakash Purushotham <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.linux
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks whiplash, I had infact used tcpdump to track down that IP and
added it in the banned sites acl. Problem solved ... atleast for the
time being. Sorry I was not prompt enough to post it here.

I wonder whether hopster uses just one server. I would be doing some
more tcpdump'ing to check whether other servers are being used. 


> From: whiplash <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: can Hopster traffic be blocked?
> Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 01:22:35 +0200
> 
> Prakash Purushotham wrote:
> 
> > Any suggestions on how I can block hopster (and other similar socks
> > based tunneling applications) from tunnelling out.
> 
> tcpdump and ehereal are often the syadmin best friends. :)
> 
> Ok, I downloaded this hopster, installed it on a win box, started
> squid on my home linux firewall, putted a rule in FORWARD chain to
> drop packets coming from the win box and then I started to observe.
> hopster wasn't apparently able to automatically detect the squid proxy, so
> I manually configured it.
> Then i started some applications, like an irc client and configured them to
> use the localhost socks proxy that hopster binded.
> 
> Ok: what did ethreal showed me?
> First: in all tests I've performed, hopster seems to use just one remote
> http tunneler:
> 
> CONNECT 62.116.83.62:443 HTTP/1.0
> 
> If this observation is correct, a simple acl that denies the CONNECT method
> to 62.116.83.62 should be suficient.
> Moreover: despite of the port showed above, the traffic isn't actually
> ssl-tunneled:
<snipped>

Best regards
Prakash
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.