Re: can Hopster traffic be blocked?
Prakash Purushotham <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks whiplash, I had infact used tcpdump to track down that IP and added it in the banned sites acl. Problem solved ... atleast for the time being. Sorry I was not prompt enough to post it here. I wonder whether hopster uses just one server. I would be doing some more tcpdump'ing to check whether other servers are being used. > From: whiplash <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: can Hopster traffic be blocked? > Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 01:22:35 +0200 > > Prakash Purushotham wrote: > > > Any suggestions on how I can block hopster (and other similar socks > > based tunneling applications) from tunnelling out. > > tcpdump and ehereal are often the syadmin best friends. :) > > Ok, I downloaded this hopster, installed it on a win box, started > squid on my home linux firewall, putted a rule in FORWARD chain to > drop packets coming from the win box and then I started to observe. > hopster wasn't apparently able to automatically detect the squid proxy, so > I manually configured it. > Then i started some applications, like an irc client and configured them to > use the localhost socks proxy that hopster binded. > > Ok: what did ethreal showed me? > First: in all tests I've performed, hopster seems to use just one remote > http tunneler: > > CONNECT 62.116.83.62:443 HTTP/1.0 > > If this observation is correct, a simple acl that denies the CONNECT method > to 62.116.83.62 should be suficient. > Moreover: despite of the port showed above, the traffic isn't actually > ssl-tunneled: <snipped> Best regards Prakash