RE: can Hopster traffic be blocked?

Alan Hicks <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.linux
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Aug 8, 2004, at 6:00 AM, [email protected] 
wrote:
> If you have a policy in the company that the users should not be able 
> to
> install unauthorized software on their machine why not just not allow
> admin access on the individual workstation.  This should alleviate the
> problem whether or not the workstations in your company are linux or
> windows.

It may work in practice against and clueless user, but against anyone 
with a modicum of Clue this simply won't work for the vast majority of 
software. Unless the software requires admin privileges to run, it can 
still be installed into a directory the user has write access to by the 
user. That user can then run that program and as long as it doesn't 
require admin privileges it should function the same. Obviously if the 
program has to run as root or has to write to the windows registry it 
won't work, but most open source software isn't restricted in either of 
these ways.

- -- 

It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise,
Than for a man to hear the song of fools.
Ecclesiastes 7:5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFBFo6xlKR45I6cfKARAm2SAJ9ZceYShcqI3gSFaTYhoB2V2bEX2ACgpc/v
TPT9i2qvnyaLzUEZfDexdPo=
=kyuQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.