RE: AW: Re: Selecting OS for High-availability/mission-critical w eb portal
Gruber Christoph <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:24:02 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <A87A7CB780C06244958AFFA02747E8A6171B805D@vimmxs1.corp.tre-sys-e.org> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: "J. Simonetti" <[email protected]>@DSI > Tbh, I totally disagree here. LFS is nice to get started when learning > linux, That's why I said, it may help you. > but for a critical servers you need some sort of package > management and well maintained repository. And then? apt-get update; apt-get upgrade; with cron every hour? You are kidding. > You cannot spend your time > updating and compiling software and fixing patches every time there is > an update whilst the next zlib/ssl exploits are floating > around the net. I have to spend the time, and if my server is REALLY critical, I will have to. Ans most of the time, my team is faster than debian. > One thing I do agree with is creating a custom kernel suited for your > hardware. Suited for the hardware and implementing a couple of security features. > I think the basis for a mission critical server is its hardware. Make > sure you select hardware wich is well known and widely > supported for the > distro you intend to run. Don't choose exotic hardware raid cards just > because they might work good. Choose the one wich has the > best drivers. > The same goes for all other hardware offcourse. The hardware can do a lot for availability, of course, but nothing for security (except physical security) > Now for the distro to choose there is a wide variety which > can be used. > Whatever your needs are, pick a distro with good support. Depending on > what kind of server you need to run choices could be (but are not > limited to) Openbsd for firewalls/security, Solaris for stability and > support, Ever tried to customize your Solaris-kernel? > Debian for feature richness or Redhat Enterprise for a large > hardware base and its support. > If pure stability is the only factor in my decision I would go for > Openbsd or Solaris and choose hardware which is 'known-to-be-good' for > those platforms. Best regards -- Christoph Gruber, CISM Chief Security Officer WAT1SD, Security & Data Protection WAVE Solutions Information Technology GmbH A-1090 Wien, Nordbergstraße 13 Tel.: +43 (1) 71730-53514, Fax: +43 (1) 71730-54230 mobile: +436648122661 [email protected] http://www.wave-solutions.com