Re: Selecting OS for High-availability/mission-critical web p ortal
Syv Ritch <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:37:53 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20061213163753.55446b97@tadpole> |
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:05:50 +0100 "J. Simonetti" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 20:13 +0100, Gruber Christoph wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > If you want to build up a web server with these requirements, you > > won`t be satisfied with any distro. > > I think you will need to build up your binaries on your own. > > A critical server won`t have any paket manager at all. > > And other reqs like a statically linked kernel build for your > > hardware isn`t found in an distro. High availability is a network design issue not an OS issue. All OSes can be and are high availability. It does not matter how reliable are these servers [Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris... are all reliable today], if the network is down! Having a couple of servers on the west coast and another couple on the East coast on different carriers [if in North America], with proper DNS configuration will make this a very high availability. Then comes: how are these servers protected? With a proper firewall, or a they naked on the Internet [naked is my preference, because they will be configured with the minimum of services.] Using squid are a reverse proxy will enhance their security and therefore availability. What will you be running on these boxes? Apache, IIS, PHP, Perl, Java, .Net. Any dayabase? ... This is far more important in availability that which OS. There are many more things to look at. That why you need a good consultant ie: $$$... -- Thanks http://www.911networks.com When the network has to work