RE: mail antivirus

"Darrell Hyde" <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:33:36 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.linux
Message-ID <8E3A4B11F5261E4AB2AAC551BB4A276D133F92@hmsexch.corp.safesecureweb.com>
I used f-secure with postfix / amavis for virus filtering. F-secure's commerial, but its not too pricey per-server - worked like a charm too. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Oscar Bossans
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 3:16 PM
> To: Stephen Summerfield; mircea
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: mail antivirus
> 
> Stephen
> 
> Can you give me a link to read more, I'have serious problems 
> with spam and 
> spamassassin is not enough at less to me.
> 
> pd: I' use Clamav and it's work perfect, filtered all virus.
> pd2: sorry my english
> 
> Atte.
> Oscar Bossans L.
> Depto. Informática Bramell Ltda.
> Fono: 051-247976 Anexo 15
> Coquimbo
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Stephen Summerfield" <[email protected]>
> To: "mircea" <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 3:52 PM
> Subject: Re: mail antivirus
> 
> 
> > Mircea,
> >
> > 1) DSPAM - very effective, it learns what is spam and what 
> is not and 
> > continues to learn so it adapts to different styles of 
> spam. Learning  is 
> > very fast and false positives are virtually nil (in fact I 
> can't  remember 
> > the last time I had one - I'm talking many months, if not  
> years). I have 
> > arranged for spam to be automatically moved to a  separate 
> 'Junk'  folder 
> > on an IMAP server based on DSPAM's  classification using a 
> simple sieve 
> > script. However I still monitor  the junk folder just in 
> case, but it's 
> > hardly worth it and I could  probably simply delete these mails.
> >
> > 2) SQLGrey - (not actually a SPAM filter, I use it front of and in- 
> > conjunction with DSPAM). Highly effective and as unobtrusive as a 
> > greylisting solution can be. Occasionally annoying having 
> to wait a  few 
> > minutes for emails from a new source (eg site registration  
> emails), but 
> > the number of spams that simply get dropped, makes it  very 
> worthwhile.
> >
> > I now get approximately 15  spam emails a day (as opposed 
> to 200 a  day) 
> > and these are mostly to postmaster, hostmaster, webmaster, etc  RFC 
> > addresses to my domains. Only the occasional spam is to my 
> real  email 
> > address and this address I have used for over 10 years and  
> posted to 
> > usenet, mailing lists and used for pretty much everything  
> (i.e. I've not 
> > been overly careful with it).
> >
> > Hope that helps,
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > On 22 Aug 2007, at 17:54, mircea wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> what kind of antivirus filter are you using on linux mail servers?
> >>
> >> I appreciate solution names and a few words on why you're using it.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mircea
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> !DSPAM:46cdb439321391626116346!
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
> > en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
> > y se considera que está limpio.
> > For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
> en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
> y se considera que está limpio.
> For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk
> 
>