RE: mail antivirus
"Paul Ryland" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Sep 2007 12:08:12 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.linux |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <F3EA376FC97BB84EB386525C5DDDE44001297FA5@kippery.Transversalcorp.local> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Walsh > Sent: 23 August 2007 19:09 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: mail antivirus > > ClamAV. http://www.clamav.net/ > > Open Source. Virus definitions automatically updated with new > definitions via freshclam. New strains added very quickly. > Client / Server model. > > We use a shell script to make clamscan work with maildrop > xfilter and it works very well. > > No complaints other than some issues with the code base > evolving a little to quickly which can make it difficult to > keep up to date (some newer virus definitions will not work > with an older version of clamscan so you need to check the > logs of freshclam occasionally for "WARNING: Your ClamAV > installation is OUTDATED!" and update when needed). It is evolving rapidly for a very good reason: <http://search.securityfocus.com/swsearch?query=clamav&sbm=archive%2F1%2F&submit=Search%21&metaname=alldoc&sort=swishlastmodified> Yes, that's 7 pages of vulnerabilities over the last 3 years. They ClamAV developers have a very commendable attitude to fixing security issues, but you do have to keep an eye out on the bugtrack list for the weekly issues. Shame I cannot say the same about some very popular mailservers. YMMV. Paul