Re: NASL2 new operators & precedence

Michel Arboi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.nessus.devel
Message-ID <1043412880.1044.4.camel@rotissoire>
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 13:36, Richard Moore wrote:
> Is this change likely to affect the semantics of any of the
> existing NASL scripts?

No. Many NASL2 operators do not exist en NASL1. And NASL1 does not
accept complex expressions without parenthesis.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.