Re: NASL2 new operators & precedence

Renaud Deraison <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.nessus.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 01:54:37PM +0100, Michel Arboi wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 13:36, Richard Moore wrote:
> > Is this change likely to affect the semantics of any of the
> > existing NASL scripts?
> 
> No. Many NASL2 operators do not exist en NASL1. And NASL1 does not
> accept complex expressions without parenthesis.

And even so, the result is so unpredictible that most expressions split
in several instructions.

				-- Renaud
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.