Re: NASL2 new operators & precedence
Richard Moore <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.nessus.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Renaud Deraison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 01:54:37PM +0100, Michel Arboi wrote: > >>On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 13:36, Richard Moore wrote: >> >>>Is this change likely to affect the semantics of any of the >>>existing NASL scripts? >> >>No. Many NASL2 operators do not exist en NASL1. And NASL1 does not >>accept complex expressions without parenthesis. > > > And even so, the result is so unpredictible that most expressions split > in several instructions. Great, thanks. Rich. > > -- Renaud > -- Richard Moore, Principle Software Engineer Westpoint Ltd.