Re: New Text Format Discussion
Wolfgang Keller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.passwordsafe.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There are some points that I'ld like to clearify about the "Format Description Block" (Also consider to integrate some parts of the answers into the format definition text!): a) The file format number, available in the "Password" field, does it follow the program version number when the file is being created or is it a number "in its own right"? If the latter, will there be a new version number when the new string interpretation scheme is going to be used? b) The "Options" string: i) what is its charset used? ii) how are "quoted strings" represented? (I may point out that strings here underly principally the same problem about different locale charsets.) - Wolfgang Rony Shapiro wrote: > Indeed, the original version of passwordsafe did not have any concept of >database version. >Also, when designing v2, I took the conservative approach of trying to keep >backwards compatibility, at least so that a user opening a new database with >an old application would have some indication of what happened. In >retrospect, perhaps this was too conservative, and I should have just >changed the suffix of the database... > >However, the current database format *does* have a version string in the >database. At least I got *that* right. > > Rony > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click