Re: New Text Format Discussion

Wolfgang Keller <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.passwordsafe.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
There are some points that I'ld like to clearify about the "Format 
Description Block" (Also consider to integrate some parts of the answers 
into the format definition text!):

a)  The file format number, available in the "Password" field, does it 
follow the program version number when the file is being created or is 
it a number "in its own right"? If the latter, will there be a new 
version number when the new string interpretation scheme is going to be 
used?

b)  The "Options" string: i) what is its charset used? ii) how are 
"quoted strings" represented? (I may point out that strings here underly 
principally the same problem about different locale charsets.)

- Wolfgang

Rony Shapiro wrote:

> Indeed, the original version of passwordsafe did not have any concept of
>database version.
>Also, when designing v2, I took the conservative approach of trying to keep
>backwards compatibility, at least so that a user opening a new database with
>an old application would have some indication of what happened. In
>retrospect, perhaps this was too conservative, and I should have just
>changed the suffix of the database...
>
>However, the current database format *does* have a version string in the
>database. At least I got *that* right.
>
>	Rony
>
>  
>
>  
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.