Validation flaw addressed in version 2.14
"Rony Shapiro" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.passwordsafe.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, The good folks at elcomsoft have posted an item regarding a flaw in the passphrase validation for all versions of PasswordSafe. (http://seclists.org/lists/vulnwatch/2005/Oct-Dec/0046.html) Briefly, it's possible to take advantage of the database structure to bypass the deliberately slow "key stretching" method used to verify the user's passphrase, enabling a faster brute-force dictionary attack than was intended by the designers. In release 2.14, I've implemented a partial fix to this, basically replacing fixed data with randomness wherever possible in the first block. This is a partial fix, but it's the most I can do without breaking backwards compatability with existing implementations (and it seems that I've already broken compatability with the Java version...). I'd like to ask this list for suggestions for (1) a better solution that would keep compatability with previous versions (that is, that previous versions 2.x of PasswordSafe will be able to read the new database, and (2) a complete solution, unencumbered by backwards-compatability (that is, a new version of the database format). Thanks to Jeff & Hagai for bringing the vulnwatch posting to my attention. Cheers, Rony P.S. - I've decided not to announce this to the user's mailing list for two reasons: 1. The issue is a bit subtle and therefore difficult to explain. Conversely, it's *very* easy to misunderstand as "passwordsafe's security is/was broken". 2. The fix isn't a complete solution to the problem (yet). Of course, ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click