RE: re: Reverse mode anomaly?
"Neil Winton" <neil.winton-XZoyATsUNX5Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Fri, 21 Nov 2003 22:21:58 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.zebedee.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The reading of the proxy response should be done more intelligently -- my
previous message still stands, in describing the behaviour but I ought to
read proxy responses in a better way in any case. Just increasing
MAX_LINE_LENGTH probably isn't the way to go as it would increase overall
memory usage unnecessarily.
Regards,
Neil
-----Original Message-----
From: zebedee-talk-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
[mailto:zebedee-talk-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org]On Behalf Of Andrew J.
Richardson
Sent: 07 November 2003 16:44
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Zebedee-talk] re: Reverse mode anomaly?
Upon further experimenting it seems the constant MAX_LINE_LENGTH (1024) is
not large enough for my proxy's responses. Unfortunately, I don't have the
facility to recompile for my Windows environment or I'd increase that and
see what happens. I also don't have a sniffer to watch the traffic in and
out of my machine, so this is just a theory. It appears borne out, though,
by the ZBD program crash I experience at the point it tries connecting to
the proxy. I have more than one proxy I can use; most cause a crash and the
others give me the recursive re-connect I previously mentioned.
Neil, is there any harm in your increasing MAX_LINE_LENGTH to double or
more in the next version?
Andrew