Re: commits for possible 5.9.1

On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 8:25 AM Peter Stephenson
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Speaking from an overall co-ordination point of view, rather than
> attempting to judge the detailed technical merit, I'm actually happy to
> see this go in, as long as you and Bart are reasonably happy

If the point of this discussion is to create a relatively stable
5.9.1, then namerefs are not a good candidate.

> [...] that would mean we can go straight to a
> full release, which saves a lot of legwork.

In that case I (or someone) would need to finish applying the five (?)
patches Philippe has already produced, and we should just go right
ahead to 5.10 and not call it 5.9.1.