Re: commits for possible 5.9.1

> On 29/04/2026 16:46 BST Bart Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > [...] that would mean we can go straight to a
> > full release, which saves a lot of legwork.
> 
> In that case I (or someone) would need to finish applying the five (?)
> patches Philippe has already produced, and we should just go right
> ahead to 5.10 and not call it 5.9.1.

Yes, "a full release" was intended to imply that it was not in the scope
of an interim stable release, I think this aspect is likely
uncontroversial.

The controversy would be if anyone foresees problems with that plan.

cheers
pws