Re: why sourceid idff 2.0 only supports jboss?
Dave Smith <[email protected]> Mon, 23 May 2005 19:48:53 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sourceid.sso.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Conceptually, you could port the IDFF 1.2 toolkit to another web container. We released with JBoss, simply because we have a limited number of resources and can't really afford to test/qualify it on a bunch of other platforms. JBoss is our app-server of choice for Open Source development, that's why we picked it over Tomcat (for instance). I understand your frustration, but please understand that we are doing the best we can to provide a free implementation of IDFF 1.2. It may not be on your platform of choice, but it is possible (with a little work) to make it run elsewhere. Hope that helps. :) D. On 5/23/05, yes <[email protected]> wrote: > Sourceid recently released idff(1.2) java toolkit version 2.0. In fact, > we have used its beta version earlier. Although we have some trouble > running the demo(for example, the artifact cannot run smoothly), we are > more concern about its WEB CONTAINER support. > We've seen someone post such question in this list, but without any answe= r. > To us, earlier version sourceid idff toolkit that supports tomcat can be > better used, because once support tomcat, there is a wide spectrum of > environment that it can work on, including jboss. While only supports > jboss (we will describe why we are sure of this in next paragraph), the > valid environment becomes A POINT: ONLY JBOSS, not anything else. We > cannot understand this change: is it because commercial consideration, > or is it because jboss' implementation is easier? > Why we think new version ONLY supports jboss? While compiling, if > untouched, everything goes well. But if we elimilate jboss classpath in > the ant build.xml file, there will be errors. The package requiring > jboss is "Implementation", which Castlepeak relies on. >=20 > To our understanding, it is not nessasary to implement idff 1.2 under > jboss. And to our knowlage, there exist "lasso" that do idff1.2 in C++, > it could be invoked from .NET, Java, Python, PHP, etc. > We don't think it is a good choice to only target one environment while > implementing standards. For anybody insterested in this would like to > make it run on more servers. > _______________________________________________ > sso-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sourceid.org/mailman/listinfo/sso-users >