Re: why sourceid idff 2.0 only supports

yes <[email protected]> Wed, 25 May 2005 14:35:08 +0800

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.sourceid.sso.user
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Thanks for replying.
I re-studied the source files and re-compiled CastlePeak & Infranstrcture. I found that CastlePeak doesn't need jboss itself. And there is only one file that needs jboss:
/org/sourceid/jaas/AbstractSoapLoginModule.java
which needs  org.jboss.security.auth.callback.SecurityAssociationCallback.

My conclusion is that: the whole sourceid2.0(idff1.2) package can be ported to other web containers IFF we change the file AbstractSoapLoginModule.java.
Am I right?