Re: Using revision levels instead of new component numbers

Sounds like you have done the necessary homework to decide to bite the bullet on revisions.  It does work well except that there is another layer of discipline required.  This involves when to switch over to a new revision (use effectivity dates), working off the old inventory/revision level, when to start ordering components, using an engineering site to get everything ready before moving to production, and so on.  The point is to get your internal procedures worked out and get commitment to follow them.  You asked about tracking inventory by revision.  This is coming, but for now the only "simple" way is a different batch/lot no. and possible physical segregation.  From a production planning/scheduling standpoint the right tool is VPi because it will let you plan and schedule more than one revision of the same item side-by-side.


Best Regards

Richard (Dick) Stover | Consulting Manager
C: 215-499-8530 | E: [email protected] 

  |Putting the ROI in ERP |  
  

-----Original Message-----
From: mapics-l-bounces-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] [mailto:mapics-l-bounces-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]] On Behalf Of Barb.MacIntosh-0lVCP8tFGSop/+exSnkZrgC/[email protected]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:50 AM
To: mapics-l-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Subject: [MAPICS-L] Using revision levels instead of new component numbers

We are looking for a solution to avoid the ever growing practice of assigning new component numbers every time the component changes. (one school of thought here on interpreting the form, fit, function rule)

Has anyone had success in using the revision level feature in XA?  We have done some testing on this and it seems to work well- we created revisions with different costs and effective dates and tried them out in bills of material. Some are hesitant about the fact that we cannot track inventory by revision level.

We are at release 7.06

Any feedback would be appreciated.














The information contained in this email, including attachments, is confidential and may be legally privileged and protected from disclosure by the Electronic Communication Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521. It is intended solely for the addressee(s), and if the reader is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any access, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this communication by anyone is strictly prohibited. Any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on this email is prohibited and may be unlawful. Neither Hutchinson FTS, Hutchinson Sealing Systems Inc., Paulstra CRC, the Hutchinson Group nor any of its subsidiaries shall assume legal liability or responsibility for any incorrect, misleading or altered information contained herein. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the email and deleting it from your computer.
_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To post a message email: MAPICS-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.

_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.