MAPICS-l Digest to: Pam Faggart from: Mike Ellis / ISI
Michael Ellis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.systems.as400.mapics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJSyu3Q4PLdoC57FKMPXnWrx4vx1wQMVyw0_mUNk8LGL+g=tZw@mail.gmail.com> |
Pam, I recommend to my customers that they only switch on the flag requiring vendor accept (VA) transactions for vendors with whom they have carefully designed the procurement process. The interplay in the relationship between supplier and customer should be designed and carefully agreed. Thus the vendor knows and agrees that he is responsible to acknowledge the PO's (price, items, quantities, delivery dates). With that simple agreement, vendors who participate actively can be brought closer to your firm. The tighter relationship makes for a better supply chain. The promise to the vendor is the likely better relationship that similarly drives more of your business to that supplier. Obviously, the first vendors to start with are the biggest ones, the most critical ones. The others who are not a part of the program maybe don't matter nearly so much. Then the lack of a VA will trigger only necessary alerts to the receiving team and responses from the procurement team. Hope this helps. Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: MAPICS-L [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Faggart, Pam > Sent: 13 January 2015 19:11 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [MAPICS-L] Receive despite no VA > > We have begun to use the "Require PO accept", but not all suppliers are > consistently providing Vendor acknowledgements. Consequently we have delays > in receiving since there is a restriction that POs cannot be received > unless the VA has processed (PO no longer in status 10). Business has > asked us to override this and allow receipt even when PO is in status 10. > We are cautious to do this override since there must be valid reasons for > this restriction to have been put into place. > > What have others experienced when requiting PO acceptances? Are you > proactive to process all VAs prior to receipt, reactive when it is time to > receive, or implementing some other overrides to eliminate disruptions? > > Pam Faggart > > Senior Business Analyst > > AGCO > > > > > Jackson, MN 56143 > > ------------------------------ > > End of MAPICS-L Digest, Vol 13, Issue 4 > *************************************** > -- Michael G. Ellis CEO / Enterprise Consultant Information Systems International, Inc. A Global ERP Consulting Firm 815-398-1670 x7882 -- OR -- CALL ME <http://www.ringcentral.com/ringme/ringme.asp?uc=333DDE9A4B3017B2B2722A7A8771521F958259643963,0,7882&s=no&v=2> / MEET WITH ME? <https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?mode=WEEK&[email protected]&ctz=America/Chicago> To the extent possible, I write my emails in the language of the recipients (English or German or both). If you have difficulty understanding my message, please ask for clarification. When you respond to my emails, PLEASE use your mother-tongue. If I have difficulty understanding, I will ask for clarification. So weit möglich, schreibe ich meine E-Mails in der Sprache der Empfänger (Englisch oder Deutsch oder beides). Wenn Sie Schwierigkeiten beim Verstehen meiner Botschaft haben, bitten Sie um Klärung. Wenn Sie auf meine E-Mails reagieren, verwenden Sie bitte Ihre Muttersprache. Wenn ich Schwierigkeiten habe, Ihre E-Mail zu verstehen, werde ich um Klärung zu bitten. Michael Ellis on Google+ <http://gplus.to/MichaelGEllisISI> -- This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To post a message email: [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l or email: [email protected] Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.