build on systems without sbrk

Dan Langille <[email protected]> Sat, 9 Dec 2023 11:30:21 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.bacula.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Some time ago, the FreeBSD ports of bacula9, bacula11, and bacula13 were all marked as broken on aarch64 and riscv64 because of missing sbrk

Will the upcoming Bacula 15 release have the same issue? If so, let's fix it in the code, so we don't have to patch it down stream? I'm sure it affects more than FreeBSD.

references:

* https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/bacula9-client/ <https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/bacula9-client/> - 01 Jan 2021 23:51:49

Now we a code review which should allow the build to succeed on hosts without sbrk.  I hope this can help our code.

https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42979 <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42979>

I don't know enough about sbrk to comment.

Hope this helps.

-- 
Dan Langille
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel