Re: code 11: files changed during backup
Lasse Kliemann <lasse-list-dar-discussions-2007-vHKVnW1TcfEx7OB5OnRqRA@public.gmane.org> Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:54:03 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.dar.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Denis Corbin writes: > Lasse Kliemann wrote: [...] > > Yes. Having these "AND"-"OR"-Feature would be near to an ultimate solution. I > > am unsure whether this is really necessary, however. If I were you, it would > > very much depend on the effort necessary to implement this. > > Implementing this logical operator is not that much more complicated > than a set of switch that (three switches so far) which would be much > more restrictive. > > > I presume that > > the simple solution (three upper bounds) will be sufficient most of the time. > > Maybe others on this list might want to express their views on this. > > > > The problem is that, it would be OK for you, but sooner or later some > will ask for some other combination of theses three switches or for > other switches... As the enhancement of an already implemented feature > may become complicated if its design is too restrictive, it is better to > directly go to something that can easily receive new logical operator as > well as new criteria... as much as the cost to implement is not extravagant. Regarding this experience of yours, it in fact seems better to go all the way and implement this logic. I am looking forward to this feature in dar. If you need someone to test it, just shout. All the best, Lasse ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Dar-discussions mailing list Dar-discussions-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dar-discussions
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF/txK1gObwed86AkRAhHLAKDDjrQ9N/F3WYZTGO7Y2pFBS1EwuACfcGsx zsIklljiuaaCS33m7py2y08= =V9b7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----