Re: code 11: files changed during backup

Lasse Kliemann wrote:
> * Denis Corbin writes:
> 
>>Lasse Kliemann wrote:
> 
>  
>  [...]
> 
>>>Yes. Having these "AND"-"OR"-Feature would be near to an ultimate solution. I 
>>>am unsure whether this is really necessary, however. If I were you, it would 
>>>very much depend on the effort necessary to implement this.
>>
>>Implementing this logical operator is not that much more complicated
>>than a set of switch that (three switches so far) which would be much
>>more restrictive.
>>
>>
>>>I presume that 
>>>the simple solution (three upper bounds) will be sufficient most of the time. 
>>>Maybe others on this list might want to express their views on this.
>>>
>>
>>The problem is that, it would be OK for you, but sooner or later some
>>will ask for some other  combination  of theses three switches or for
>>other switches... As the enhancement of an already implemented feature
>>may become complicated if its design is too restrictive, it is better to
>>directly go to something that can easily receive new logical operator as
>>well as new criteria... as much as the cost to implement is not extravagant.
> 
> 
> Regarding this experience of yours, it in fact seems better to go all the way 
> and implement this logic. I am looking forward to this feature in dar. If you 
> need someone to test it, just shout.

Thanks. Just be patient... there is some important/large feature in the
pipe before this one... :-/

> 
> 
> All the best, Lasse
> 
> 

Regards,
Denis.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

_______________________________________________
Dar-discussions mailing list
Dar-discussions-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dar-discussions

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF/uBtpC5CI8gYGlIRAoABAJ0SE7+zB5KA901nxZDgdQ45ZK4pMgCgw2vB
0pf7AIxYTEMXC5XpglnksoQ=
=y5S1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----