Re: 2.6 ETA?
Denis Corbin <[email protected]> Sun, 1 Jul 2018 22:21:51 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.dar.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 01/07/2018 16:12, mannino wrote: > Is there any estimate on when 2.6 will be made available for > public? I have read it has been stable since last year (?) and > originally planned for release "near the end of" 2017. yes, the project got some delay due to heavy load at work (I mean real work, the one I'm paid for) family constraints and some new features that were more complex than I expected to add properly. I have completed all planned features, the libdar API needed a global redesign, this is done too. Features have been tested individually, but there is still a lot of testing to perform globally and probably some bugs to understand and fix. I also need to do performance testing due to the change of memory allocation used. I had planned to provide a real C and Python API to libdar in addition to the native C++ API. The Python binding done by Wesley Legette years ago has not been maintained while libdar has received many new features releases after releases... thus I find easier to restart this from scratch... But I have postponed these API for after release 2.6.0 to gain time. Last some crypto specific things have to be upgraded too to adapt to the evolution of technology and means, for example using AES by default instead of blowfish, increase key sizes, change hashing algorithms and so on... So to be precise, I concentrate on crypto upgrade, performance and documentation, for I hope a pre-release phase in September, maybe sooner. Don't take it for granted, I work on my spare time... but I Will do my best to hold this target. The official release would take place one or two month later depending on the number of persons participating in the pre-release phase. > > I am currently deploying a backup system which absolutely must use > the --delta feature of dar. I'd like to know if I should wait for > 2.6 a bit longer or look for alternative options (I love dar and > would rather stick to it when possible). Which feature do you expect to find in 2.6.x? Thanks for your patience, Denis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIVAwUBWzk33wgxsL0D2LGCAQhoMRAAg+NgnPFTPDRHNvYMHkK5kg+lRPj9N3dX BBg3gcE/AHlAZdIQOF3rOobR4EAA/mLK2nedmnhhRLxGstKcFgJUHFduXwqSo3Wv Yi1NVAmjKNaRYwz7ZiHBck3RASmNaONLiCXjcHm+z5UW8bSwvYipnRZDxH8ZPjxK 8KJjqUA9qOeQcav0BvpY9HTPdWK8uBoIu/68t2gPcu8naOmqDJqoqkYEIXaE+qTb XH1qLjFkUSQZGwedaYK+s8zmA0EB6AQx19WpordxikRWJvud/trh95AZJ6CRnZWY XbRYzUWQGP6UsB6kE4cckNPof6BxXzAIMg8aKfRWNGRoukmQNU61hyTzApG6vPZ1 6MU1VpLCNP5ljUbuAqIi292VarpTprAv1Cu7XIaBtF1kXYnhUOe8D+cH0ykPF0v7 5QYZZ0MhxeHfBP/TldOlL7Cj8yRrxgX1GRnxxglmVplg8yF6DNIpaTYaOIrTgSIR CJCzaTvPAWNwWkOE3A42VZMvAbxCRWXCX7EzjLpQaZ0QxrbD1zoNhOzFshxokdKl A3W2OErzTWEr7eo0jaQ3E506VIol9uQdKru331EobC9FeXe8pjCGvsE4Svdl6vOS R3O2vtYe33Jwoq7Y213e+sTXYwclWKek+V+S45Tk7okNXzREvGNTHV3Q9kvHHr2u GTXHN7+gmLc= =LXFd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot