Re: archive methods?
Denis Corbin <[email protected]> Sat, 17 Jul 2004 17:46:05 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.dar.libdar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christian Neumann wrote: | On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:22:50 +0200 | Denis Corbin <[email protected]> wrote: | | |>any objections ? comments ? ;-) | | My two cents: I would prefer a more object oriented API, because OO | programming is more convenient.. Of course it would be difficult for a C | programmer to understand the API, but at last it's a C++ library and not | a C library. And you can't use libdar in C programs, can you (correct me | if I'm wrong)? Non-OO C++ is just worse than plain C (IMHO). that makes sens. So it we will go this way. | | Regards, | Christian Cheers, Denis. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFA+Um8pC5CI8gYGlIRAvwBAJ44il9f3jYMv9U4RW08B9CaM8PTdQCgrf1h D9fvinB5BUK0IjOEUT8iSHY= =F0Dc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click