Re: Re: archive methods?

Johnathan Burchill <[email protected]> Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:48:17 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.dar.libdar
Organization Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On July 17, 2004 09:46 am, Denis Corbin wrote:
> Christian Neumann wrote:
> | On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:22:50 +0200
> |
> | Denis Corbin <[email protected]> wrote:
> |>any objections ? comments ? ;-)
> |
> | My two cents: I would prefer a more object oriented API, because OO
> | programming is more convenient.. Of course it would be difficult for a
> | C programmer to understand the API, but at last it's a C++ library and
> | not a C library. And you can't use libdar in C programs, can you
> | (correct me if I'm wrong)? Non-OO C++ is just worse than plain C
> | (IMHO).
>
> that makes sens. So it we will go this way.
>

Sounds good. :!

JB

> | Regards,
> | Christian
>
> Cheers,
> Denis.
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
> FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
> Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Dar-libdar_api mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dar-libdar_api

-- 
Johnathan K. Burchill, Ph.D.
Department of Physics and Astronomy
University of Calgary
2500 University Drive N.W.
Calgary, AB T2N 1N4
Canada

(403) 217-4286
[email protected]
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBA+VhRrXMSOtiWrO4RAk+8AKDjFJ/e4vzzsM4Z/mf5j5UK01mULQCguMfR
1taXLJsWnk5zg6MVGs+eedA=
=y7Bf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----