Re: Miscomputed CRC's
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.dar.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 13.01.20 18:40, Richard Gray wrote: >I have tried a single pass of memtest86, tried memtext86+ ? how much RAM? It's a physical machine I assume. >Additionally, I have tried the --hash option on my latest incremental >backup and the hash *doesn't* match, using sha512. try multiple passes on the same machine. If they produce different result, you surely have a HW problem. >On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 17:21, Denis Corbin <[email protected]> wrote: >> If you see the amount of executable instruction versus the amount of >> data that a RAM has to hold today, this is not that much surprising. >> Added to this the fact the kernel is located at a fixed place, still >> the same anytime you reboot, it may well have no change to use the >> faulty portion of RAM... >> >> you should have confirmation by running memtest86+ as "suggested" by >> Matus. Until then faulty memory is still an hypothesis to be actually Mihai recommended it first. P.S. I didn't want to be rude, you just seemed to ignore very valid recommendation to test memory. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. (R)etry, (A)bort, (C)ancer