Version of tar
usr local <usrlocalinfo-/[email protected]> Wed, 12 Jan 2005 04:10:54 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.hdup.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There was a post not too long ago about mentioning the version of tar we use. I'm using Debian Sarge (testing) and the version of tar is currently 1.13.93 Frankly, star seems to be a better tar than gnu tar. The only drawback is the behavior compatibility with gnu tar which seems to have a big marketshare. However, many think star behavior is 'more correct' because star is Posix compliant. star also supports Access Control Lists (ACL) and is faster than gnu tar due to advanced buffering. Kinda ironic how this sounds like the Linux vs Microsoft we've heard so often (standards-compliant + technical superiority vs marketshare)--except it is being applied to a GNU utility this time. :) If hdup 2.x will work fine with gnu tar 1.13.93, then I don't mind using tar. Just mentioning star here because it was mentioned as a possible replacement for gnu tar--and support for ACL and very long filenames are kinda good to have in a backup program. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com