Re: Windows
James Treworgy <jamie-cnAK0CFwdQRWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:27:56 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.hdup.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Miek Gieben <miekg@...> writes: > although I hate windows :), I'm willing to invest some time in this, > provided that someone can point out to me that gnu tar and openssh > already run on windows. Otherwise it would be an effort in futility. Miek.. thanks for your comments. Honestly... I had simply assumed that there was a windows port of OpenSSH. It looks like there is not. However, there seems to be a distribution using some stripped-down version of Cygwin that appears to be kept fairly current: http://sshwindows.sourceforge.net/ GNU tar for windows, looks like there's a port but it's not complete: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/tar.htm However - if one needs to run Cygwin in order for SSH to work, wouldn't it make as much sense to simply run GNU tar under Cygwin also? I'm not very familiar with Cygwin, but that would seem easier than having a native windows TAR work against a Cygwin OpenSSH. > The compressed files are added to the tar archive and compressed. So > the answer is: yes. I agree it sounds like a tar problem (or challenge). > But then again, if you need to zip things, you might need a bigger > harddisk :) Actually I have plenty of hard disk space... I zip stuff up to keep the filesystem cleaner for old stuff that I rarely use but am not quite ready to archive to plastic & delete. Speeds up searches, etc...