Re: Re: hdup2 issues
Miek Gieben <[email protected]> Wed, 4 May 2005 08:47:31 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.hdup.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [On 03 May, @22:08, DJB wrote in "[hdup-user] Re: hdup2 issues ..."] > >#1 fix gnu tar and see if I can get the patch into gnu tar. If that =20 > > fails try to push it to Debian. That means maintaining 2 slightly > > different version of hdup2, but it can be done. > > > >#2 and maybe pull out the restore capability and create 2 tools, > > hdup2-dump and hdup2-restore. But unless this yields some MAJOR > > benefits for the hdup maintenance, it won't be done/released. > > > >Any comments? > > > Is there a potential shorter-term solution? Well... not really, as in I'm not sure how to fix this using only hdup. So soon I will re-check gnu tar again and see if there is a quick fix. After that I will put two patches on the webpage, one for tar and one for hdup. I know applying patches is a pain and I also really like to apt-get install stuff, but I see no alternative. > For example, is there a workaround or extra hdup-related util or=20 > quickfix that can help us deal with the annoying bug until it is more=20 > properly fixed? The only dirty way I see, would be to also store all directory permissions along side the archive, by using a shell script or something. -- grtz, - Miek http://www.miek.nl http://www.nlnetlabs.nl PGP Key ID: 0xB18453A1 fingerprint: 002B B079 0DDA 7D44 2B5C CAB0 C3B7 F943 B184 53A1 --Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCeHADw7f5Q7GEU6ERAqiDAKCbq0IznAOLsin8JYVmKvtMv07nrACeK9Uj 3zV2wc7KlFJb7rDD7JkAdUE= =yhnz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od--