Re: Re: hdup2 issues

Miek Gieben <[email protected]> Wed, 4 May 2005 08:47:31 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.hdup.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

[On 03 May, @22:08, DJB wrote in "[hdup-user] Re: hdup2 issues ..."]
> >#1 fix gnu tar and see if I can get the patch into gnu tar. If that =20
> >  fails try to push it to Debian. That means maintaining 2 slightly
> >  different version of hdup2, but it can be done.
> >
> >#2 and maybe pull out the restore capability and create 2 tools,
> >  hdup2-dump and hdup2-restore. But unless this yields some MAJOR
> >  benefits for the hdup maintenance, it won't be done/released.
> >
> >Any comments?
> >
> Is there a potential shorter-term solution?

Well... not really, as in I'm not sure how to fix this using only
hdup. So soon I will re-check gnu tar again and see if there is a
quick fix. After that I will put two patches on the webpage, one
for tar and one for hdup. I know applying patches is a pain and I
also really like to apt-get install stuff, but I see no alternative.

> For example, is there a workaround or extra hdup-related util or=20
> quickfix that can help us deal with the annoying bug until it is more=20
> properly fixed?

The only dirty way I see, would be to also store all directory
permissions along side the archive, by using a shell script or
something.

--
grtz,
  - Miek

http://www.miek.nl                      http://www.nlnetlabs.nl
PGP Key ID: 0xB18453A1
fingerprint: 002B B079 0DDA 7D44 2B5C  CAB0 C3B7 F943 B184 53A1


--Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCeHADw7f5Q7GEU6ERAqiDAKCbq0IznAOLsin8JYVmKvtMv07nrACeK9Uj
3zV2wc7KlFJb7rDD7JkAdUE=
=yhnz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od--