Re: copying OS X binary resources & isfile question
Vaclav Slavik <[email protected]> Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:21:38 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.bakefile.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1218061298.15422.17.camel@localhost> |
On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 18:36 +0200, Stefan Csomor wrote: > for bundle based applications yes, but single-file-apps are still supported > on OSX, I know, what I meant was if anybody in their right mind would develop such apps now. I think that any modern Mac software will target OS X only and ship as bundles, but I'm not sure. If it's true, then it should be safe to simply remove all the cruft for dealing with old-style Mac resources. > the problem of SetFile -t APPL is that then again the binary shows up with > the generic application icon (sheet with pencil, ruler etc) and in the > finder info window it claims being a 'classic application' (because the > 'carb' resources are missing)... I see :( Thanks, Vaclav ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Bakefile-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bakefile-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkiaI/IACgkQxDYa/UZSZMn+JQCeM6xihrL+cTil/oZXcPWsaFeJ rG0AoKLmnRhQQd/DOnvlJ1x6lV6N00kE =961Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----