Re: copying OS X binary resources & isfile question
Stefan Csomor <csomor-ejQy8aU/RJv3mm9ruovRYR+/[email protected]> Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:16:20 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.bakefile.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C4C1DB84.49714%[email protected]> |
Hi >> for bundle based applications yes, but single-file-apps are still supported >> on OSX, > > I know, what I meant was if anybody in their right mind would develop > such apps now. > I think that any modern Mac software will target OS X > only and ship as bundles, but I'm not sure. If it's true, then it should > be safe to simply remove all the cruft for dealing with old-style Mac > resources. either it may be a non-gui console based app, which wouldn't need any resources anyway, or if it is a GUI app then it really should be using resouces, the same goes for shared libraries / plug-ins, so I'd vote for removing everything related. As for mac_bundles.bkl I'd suggest adding a convenience BUNDLE_RESOURCES which would essentially just copy everything to $(BUNDLE)/Resources because although BUNDLE_ICONS now just does the same, I'd like to revert that to the previous version and maybe call it BUNDLE_ICON or BUNDLE_ICNS as it is always one single file ? that way it would be clear what the app's icon is and everything else would just be BUNDLE_RESOURCES, so eg also my doc icons for docview shall I do this ? Thanks, Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/